Re: logging to a pipe?

Why waste time with this?
Why not just use a named pipe?

man mkfifo

--Bryan

On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:48:27 +0200, Marten Lehmann <lehmann@cnm.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> in the logging definition for a channel I found only syslog and file.
> With the file-option, I was hoping that it would log to a script when using
>
> file "|/var/tmp/logger.pl";
>
> but it doesn't:
>
> config: error: logging channel 'my_file' file '|/var/tmp/logger.pl':
> file not found
>
> Is someone working on a pipe-option? Is there a general reason not to
> implement (it's possible in Apache).
>
> Regards
> Marten
>
>