RE: packet too big

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Danny Mayer [mailto:mayer@gis.net]
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 11:27 AM
> To: Michael Varre; bind-users@isc.org
> Subject: RE: packet too big
>
> At 11:08 AM 7/9/2004, Michael Varre wrote:
> >Yes, they are being blocked because they are larger than 512 bytes - I
> just
> >don't understand why they are that large. Seems there should be a better
> >explanation than just allowing larger packets through via a fixup.
>
> Because EDNS0 allows for packets larger than 512 and akamai will turn a
I'm sorry but I'm not familiar with EDNS0 (extended dns?). Is this normal
and is it commonplace for a small pix such as mine to have to extend
allowable size to 1024? Is this something that is just starting to popup?
Doesn't seem like it would be a standard thing set on a firewall such as a
pix if it were so commonplace.

> large list which
> won't fit into 512 bytes. Unless you prefer to use TCP for DNS data.

I wasn't aware that was an option.

>
> Danny
>
> >mv