This is a discussion on off-site slave servers? advice? within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; Dear bind-users, Right now, my domain has 5 on-site nameservers (1 master, 4 slaves) and 1 off-site ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Dear bind-users,
Right now, my domain has 5 on-site nameservers (1 master, 4 slaves) and 1 off-site slave on a different campus. There has been talk of adding yet another off-site slave in a different location, which brings up this topic. We run bind 9.2.1, and we've noticed (since upgrading from bind 8) that many domains that used to resolve now do not resolve. When looking for the reason why, it always turns out that one of the non-resolving domains has a nameserver that isn't responding or that responds incorrectly. It seems that bind 8 was much more lenient in this regard, is that true? So, here's the reason for my worry: We want another off-site nameserver because we want people to be able to reach our main website (which will be mirrored elsewhere) if we're down for an extended period of time. However, since bind 9 doesn't seem to want to resolve domains where one of the nameservers doesn't respond, will having one off-site nameserver that is responding even help us if the other 5 are down? Can anybody explain in detail how this is supposed to work, and give their opinion about whether or not we should be looking into this? Thanks. Loren -- loren jan wilson, CCNA network engineering, uchicago.edu |