Re: OT: Forwarding to your ISP

This is a discussion on Re: OT: Forwarding to your ISP within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; In article <cbuoid$1f53$1@sf1.isc.org>, Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> wrote: > On ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > DNS and Related Forums > Bind Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2004
Barry Margolin
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT: Forwarding to your ISP

In article <cbuoid$1f53$1@sf1.isc.org>,
Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> wrote:

> On Tuesday 2004-06-29 12:54 pm, Barry Margolin wrote:
> > You don't need to forward to your ISP's nameserver, just let your
> > nameserver work its way down from the root servers.

>
> Barry,
>
> I apologize in advance for bringing this up, but it's always been my
> understanding that the Internet is better off if everyone forwarded their
> requests to their upstream provider (caching and all that). I know this
> has been discussed before, but the usual answer I've heard to the question
> is along the lines of "search the archives". I seem to be Google-impaired
> because I've never found a concise summary of why directly querying the
> root servers is better than forwarding. Any chance you could point me
> toward an explanation somewhere? I'd like to make sure I'm following
> current best practices.


The general concensus is that forwarding simply adds unneeded
complexity. You're dependent on the ISP's servers for something that
your servers can handle perfectly well all by themselves. ISP servers
are already handling a huge load, so it's not uncommon for them to be
overloaded (even the best run ISPs occasionally encounter unexpected
activity, or get deliberate DOS attacks), and you'll suffer as a result.

The only benefit of forwarding to the ISP's server is that you can make
use of records they've already cached because another customer asked for
it. This is helpful when your server is first starting up, but by the
time it has been running for a while it will generally have all the
popular sites cached locally, and it won't need to go out to any server.
Conversely, if there are sites that are accessed by hardly anyone but
you, you'll force the ISP to cache these records even though none of
their other customers are likely to benefit (and even you won't benefit
from the ISP's caching, because it's also cached on your server); this
wastes the ISP's resources, impacting all the other customers.

--
Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***

Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0