This is a discussion on Re: 'dig -t any ...' question within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; In article <caepoh$31cp$1@sf1.isc.org>, Ladislav Vobr <lvobr@ies.etisalat.ae> wrote: > ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
In article <caepoh$31cp$1@sf1.isc.org>,
Ladislav Vobr <lvobr@ies.etisalat.ae> wrote: > jim, thanks for your support, unfortunately I have to go, I will go > through you mail today evening, > > I am really having problems, having bind retrying to authoritative > servers, I am surprised that dig work for you, since it doesn't work for > me and it tries for several time all the authoritative servers I have > and than it times-out:-( I hope it might be configuration issue, but I > doubt it. > > I was really under impression, cache type *glue* is not provided to a > recursive clients, that's how it works here for me:-( > > just a sample > > ns3.emirates.net.ae# jobs > [1] + Running snoop 10.1.1.1 > ns3.emirates.net.ae# > ns3.emirates.net.ae# > ns3.emirates.net.ae# dig any ladislav.name.ae > ns3.emirates.net.ae -> 10.1.1.1 DNS C ladislav.name.ae. Internet * ? > ns3.emirates.net.ae -> 10.1.1.1 DNS C ladislav.name.ae. Internet * ? > ns3.emirates.net.ae -> 10.1.1.1 DNS C fake1.ladislav.name.ae. > Internet Unknown (38) ? > ns3.emirates.net.ae -> 10.1.1.1 DNS C fake2.ladislav.name.ae. > Internet Unknown (38) ? > ns3.emirates.net.ae -> 10.1.1.1 DNS C fake3.ladislav.name.ae. > Internet Unknown (38) ? > ns3.emirates.net.ae -> 10.1.1.1 DNS C fake4.ladislav.name.ae. > Internet Unknown (38) ? > ns3.emirates.net.ae -> 10.1.1.1 DNS C fake5.ladislav.name.ae. > Internet Unknown (38) ? > > ; <<>> DiG 9.2.3 <<>> any ladislav.name.ae > ;; global options: printcmd > ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached > > ns3.emirates.net.ae# dig any ladislav.name.ae +norec > > ; <<>> DiG 9.2.3 <<>> any ladislav.name.ae +norec > ;; global options: printcmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 47234 > ;; flags: qr ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 5, ADDITIONAL: 0 > > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;ladislav.name.ae. IN ANY > > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: > ladislav.name.ae. 3278 IN NS fake2.ladislav.name.ae. > ladislav.name.ae. 3278 IN NS fake3.ladislav.name.ae. > ladislav.name.ae. 3278 IN NS fake4.ladislav.name.ae. > ladislav.name.ae. 3278 IN NS fake5.ladislav.name.ae. > ladislav.name.ae. 3278 IN NS fake1.ladislav.name.ae. > > ;; Query time: 42 msec > ;; SERVER: 194.170.1.99#53(194.170.1.99) > ;; WHEN: Sat Jun 12 15:24:18 2004 > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 134 > > can you explain this ? 10.x.x.x addresses are private addresses that are not reachable from the Internet. Why do you have your domain delegated to these unusable addresses? -- Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me *** |