Re: 'dig -t any ...' question

This is a discussion on Re: 'dig -t any ...' question within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; In article <caepoh$31cp$1@sf1.isc.org>, Ladislav Vobr <lvobr@ies.etisalat.ae> wrote: > ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > DNS and Related Forums > Bind Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2004
Barry Margolin
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 'dig -t any ...' question

In article <caepoh$31cp$1@sf1.isc.org>,
Ladislav Vobr <lvobr@ies.etisalat.ae> wrote:

> jim, thanks for your support, unfortunately I have to go, I will go
> through you mail today evening,
>
> I am really having problems, having bind retrying to authoritative
> servers, I am surprised that dig work for you, since it doesn't work for
> me and it tries for several time all the authoritative servers I have
> and than it times-out:-( I hope it might be configuration issue, but I
> doubt it.
>
> I was really under impression, cache type *glue* is not provided to a
> recursive clients, that's how it works here for me:-(
>
> just a sample
>
> ns3.emirates.net.ae# jobs
> [1] + Running snoop 10.1.1.1
> ns3.emirates.net.ae#
> ns3.emirates.net.ae#
> ns3.emirates.net.ae# dig any ladislav.name.ae
> ns3.emirates.net.ae -> 10.1.1.1 DNS C ladislav.name.ae. Internet * ?
> ns3.emirates.net.ae -> 10.1.1.1 DNS C ladislav.name.ae. Internet * ?
> ns3.emirates.net.ae -> 10.1.1.1 DNS C fake1.ladislav.name.ae.
> Internet Unknown (38) ?
> ns3.emirates.net.ae -> 10.1.1.1 DNS C fake2.ladislav.name.ae.
> Internet Unknown (38) ?
> ns3.emirates.net.ae -> 10.1.1.1 DNS C fake3.ladislav.name.ae.
> Internet Unknown (38) ?
> ns3.emirates.net.ae -> 10.1.1.1 DNS C fake4.ladislav.name.ae.
> Internet Unknown (38) ?
> ns3.emirates.net.ae -> 10.1.1.1 DNS C fake5.ladislav.name.ae.
> Internet Unknown (38) ?
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.2.3 <<>> any ladislav.name.ae
> ;; global options: printcmd
> ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
>
> ns3.emirates.net.ae# dig any ladislav.name.ae +norec
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.2.3 <<>> any ladislav.name.ae +norec
> ;; global options: printcmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 47234
> ;; flags: qr ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 5, ADDITIONAL: 0
>
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;ladislav.name.ae. IN ANY
>
> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> ladislav.name.ae. 3278 IN NS fake2.ladislav.name.ae.
> ladislav.name.ae. 3278 IN NS fake3.ladislav.name.ae.
> ladislav.name.ae. 3278 IN NS fake4.ladislav.name.ae.
> ladislav.name.ae. 3278 IN NS fake5.ladislav.name.ae.
> ladislav.name.ae. 3278 IN NS fake1.ladislav.name.ae.
>
> ;; Query time: 42 msec
> ;; SERVER: 194.170.1.99#53(194.170.1.99)
> ;; WHEN: Sat Jun 12 15:24:18 2004
> ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 134
>
> can you explain this ?


10.x.x.x addresses are private addresses that are not reachable from the
Internet. Why do you have your domain delegated to these unusable
addresses?

--
Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***

Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0