This is a discussion on Re: The RFC or the reason why you can not create CNAME record for the "root record" within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 05:12:06 -0500 Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote: | RFC 1034 ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 05:12:06 -0500 Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
| RFC 1034 says: "The domain system provides such a feature [aliases] | using the canonical name (CNAME) RR. A CNAME RR identifies its owner | name as an alias, and specifies the corresponding canonical name in the | RDATA section of the RR. If a CNAME RR is present at a node, no other | data should be present; this ensures that the data for a canonical name | and its aliases cannot be different." | | Since a delegated zone name is required to have SOA and NS records, if | it also had a CNAME record it would violate the restriction in the last | sentence. So how do we fix this? I think a hack/patch is the only way. But I see two different ways to approach that. Which one is likely to work in most cases? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Phil Howard KA9WGN | http://linuxhomepage.com/ http://ham.org/ | | (first name) at ipal.net | http://phil.ipal.org/ http://ka9wgn.ham.org/ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |