Re: 8.4.4 reverse zone problems

In article <c90r9v$24t8$1@sf1.isc.org>,
David Price <davelist@blackhole.com> wrote:

> > Ok, though this really asserts authority for the whole /16. This will
> > be a Bad Thing when you try to resolve addresses that are in
> > 10.20.0.0/16 but not in 10.20.192.0/20.
> >
> I try to avoid Bad Things if possible. What is the correct way to handle
> this type (/20) of delegation?

You should have 16 reverse zones: 192.20.10.in-addr.arpa through
207.20.10.in-addr.arpa. The 20.10.in-addr.arpa reverse zone should
contain 16 corresponding delegations.

--
Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***