This is a discussion on Re: BIND 9.2.3, large zone xfer and 100% CPU Utilization within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; phn@icke-reklam.ipsec.nu wrote in message news:<c69e5r$307i$1@sf1.isc.org>... > Alex Rainchik &...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
phn@icke-reklam.ipsec.nu wrote in message news:<c69e5r$307i$1@sf1.isc.org>...
> Alex Rainchik <rainchik@mail.ru> wrote: > > Hello, > > > We are using BIND 9.2.3 on Solaris8, transfering ~45Mb zone from mail-abuse.com > > every three hours, as they don't support IXFR feature. The issue we have is that > > at the end of the transfer "named" goes berserk and CPU utlilization goes trough > > the roof, up to 100% for about 5-10 minutes. > > > During those 5-10 minutes "named" does not respond to any queries, "rdnc status" > > does not work either. It's the only zone xfer running at that time.... > > > Just wondering if it's a bug or a feature? > > Garbage collection (of the old zone) could take some time. How > slow is your sun ? > > > Thank you! > > I manage a spews-zone ( about 35M in size) using IXFR between bind-9 > and it seems to go smooth on a p-1200 slave. ( i don't see any > lockups during or after loading) I think that the main issue is no IXFR support for RBL/RBL+ from mail-abuse.com You are probably right about garbage collecting, it looks like bind is using 64-byte chunks to store zone data in memory... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|