This is a discussion on Re: BIND 9.2.3, large zone xfer and 100% CPU Utilization within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Alex Rainchik wrote: > Hello, > > We are using BIND 9.2.3 on ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Alex Rainchik wrote: > Hello, > > We are using BIND 9.2.3 on Solaris8, transfering ~45Mb zone from mail-abuse.com > every three hours, as they don't support IXFR feature. The issue we have is that > at the end of the transfer "named" goes berserk and CPU utlilization goes trough > the roof, up to 100% for about 5-10 minutes. > > During those 5-10 minutes "named" does not respond to any queries, "rdnc status" > does not work either. It's the only zone xfer running at that time.... > > Just wondering if it's a bug or a feature? Alex, I'm also running Bind 9.2.3 on Solaris 8 (Ultra 10) and downloading the mail abuse zone with exactly the same result. I am also seeking a solution! I was going to post this question anyway so I might as well ask in this same thread. If I were to compile BIND on a another dual processor system and enable multi-threading (I read BIND supports that but I don't really know how to enable it) can I count on BIND to updates zones (even the BIG mail abuse zone) AND answer queries at the same time? I can't tolerate the several minutes of down time while this zone reloads and management doesn't want to revert to querying the mail abuse DNS servers directly. -Mike |