This is a discussion on Re: Strange DNS resolving behavior within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; In article <c66993$l6f$1@sf1.isc.org>, Simon Waters <Simon@wretched.demon.co.uk> wrote: &...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
In article <c66993$l6f$1@sf1.isc.org>,
Simon Waters <Simon@wretched.demon.co.uk> wrote: > John Manly wrote: > > > > Finally, I ask Genuity/Level3's name servers. Genuity/Level3 acts > > provides secondary name service for our domains. In one case it reports > > the domain or name isn't valid, and in another it times out just like my > > own nameserver does. But again, when I look up a name within the > > publishingconcepts.com domain that I know doesn't exist, I get a > > different kind of error (the expected error) back: > > > > > > $ nslookup amherst.publishingconcepts.com 4.2.49.3 # > > Genuity/Level3 > > Server: 4.2.49.3 > > Address: 4.2.49.3#53 > > Non-authoritative answer: > > *** Can't find amherst.publishingconcepts.com: No answer # WRONG ANSER > dig says this server doesn't offer recursion, although that may be > different if you are a customer please use "dig" and show the whole > output where it is useful. > You're correct -- Level(3)'s 4.2.49.x servers are authoritative-only. The caching servers are 4.2.2.x. -- Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me *** |