This is a discussion on Re: zone tranfer denied within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; SingSong wrote: >Apr 7 01:29:29 ns1 named[72]: client 206.228.179.10#40953: zone transfer >'...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
SingSong wrote:
>Apr 7 01:29:29 ns1 named[72]: client 206.228.179.10#40953: zone transfer >'mydomain.com/IN' denied >Apr 7 01:40:17 ns1 named[72]: client 144.228.254.10#56920: zone transfer >'mydomain.com/IN' denied >Apr 7 01:56:07 ns1 named[72]: client 144.228.255.10#34335: zone transfer >'mydomain.com/IN' denied > >Is this mean that my provider (Sprint) is trying to update their DNS server >from mine? They are our secondary, so I should allow the transfer? > If they are to be a functional AXFR/IXFR-based slave for the mydomain.com zone, then you *must* open up zone transfers for them. >But >then, do I have to add their IP to all of my zone records? i.e. > >zone "1.yy.xx.in-addr.arpa" { > type master; > file "isot-xx.yy.1.rev"; > allow-query { any; }; > allow-transfer { > internals; > 206.228.179.10; > 144.228.254.10; > 144.228.255.10; > }; >}; > >zone "2.yy.xx.in-addr.arpa" { > type master; > file "isot-xx.yy.2.rev"; > allow-query { any; }; > allow-transfer { > internals; > 206.228.179.10; > 144.228.254.10; > 144.228.255.10; > }; >}; > >and on and on? > No, only the zones that you want them to be able to transfer. If you find that you're repeating the same set of servers in most of your per-zone allow-transfer clauses, you might want to consider instead putting those servers in a global ("options" statement) allow-transfer clause. You'd still have the option to override that list on a zone-by-zone basis, of course. - Kevin |