This is a discussion on RE: Cnames and "virtual name based hosting" within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; bind-users-bounce@isc.org wrote: > No i was thinking exactly what i was writing. I have been having ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
bind-users-bounce@isc.org wrote:
> No i was thinking exactly what i was writing. I have been having this > discussion regarding wheter it's more correct to use many A-records > pointing to the same IP or have one A-record and many Cnames pointing > at it. I was before convinced that one A-record and many Cnames are > most correct but many people say that it's bad to use Cnames because > resolvers needs to do two lookups and also using Cnames and "virtual > name based hosting" togeather would be illegal??? > CNAMES will not cause problems for virtual web servers that = distinguished by DNS names ("name-based virtual hosting"), provided the web servers are configured to respond to the CNAME names. CNAMES do require extra work = for the DNS resolver, but the HTTP client should use the original CNAME name = in the HTTP headers when connecting to the web server. > I got the hint to read RFC 2181 section 10 and after that my world is > a mess. >=20 Hmmn... Can't really help you there. Aaron |