Re: Cnames and "virtual name based hosting"
This is a discussion on Re: Cnames and "virtual name based hosting" within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 10:08:14AM +0000, fih <frhak@hotmail.com> wrote a message of ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
04-07-2004
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cnames and "virtual name based hosting"
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 10:08:14AM +0000,
fih <frhak@hotmail.com> wrote a message of 45 lines which said: > it's bad to use Cnames because resolvers needs to do two lookups Sometimes, the nameserver does it so the resolver needs only one lookup. Since it is a BIND mailing list, you can notice that BIND 8 and BIND 9 both perform this additional processing). ~ % dig +short @ns1.nic.fr A www.afnic.fr rigolo.nic.fr. 192.134.4.20 ~ % dig +short @ns2.nic.fr A www.afnic.fr rigolo.nic.fr. ~ % dig +short @ns3.nic.fr A www.afnic.fr rigolo.nic.fr. 192.134.4.20 (ns1 = BIND 8, ns2 = nsd, ns3 = BIND 9) > and also using Cnames and "virtual name based hosting" togeather > would be illegal??? This is plainly wrong. 
|
Linear Mode
