This is a discussion on Re: Strange DNS Problem? within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; Bigdakine wrote: >Hi Folks, > > I have this weird problem. I'm testing the fallover capability of our &...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Bigdakine wrote:
>Hi Folks, > > I have this weird problem. I'm testing the fallover capability of our >mailserver. I simply shutdown sendmail on the mail server, and start it in >server mode on a backup mail server. The odd thing is that when I send mail >from outside my domain to my domain, this is handled correctly. Running >sendmail in verbose mode, I see it try the primary mailserver first, and the >deliver the mail to the seconday mail server. Well, I gues that isn't odd. The >odd part is, is that when I send email to other users within the domain, from >within the domain, it chokes. It tries to deliver to "mailhost" and when that >fails, doesn't attempt to deliver to the secondary which is akala. > >mailhost is given a cname record is it is an alias for luna, the primary mail >server > > >My forward file looks like: > >; BIND version named LOCAL-020930.002038 Mon Sep 30 00:20:38 GMT 2002 >; BIND version root@akala:/opt/share/bind/src/bin/named >; zone 'XXXX.COMM.GOV' last serial 2004022920 >; from 150.70.102.225:53 (local 150.70.102.156) using AXFR at Sun Feb 29 >20:18:59 2004 >; TSIG verified: key luna-akala. >$ORIGIN COMM.GOV. >XXXX 86400 IN SOA luna.XXXX.COMM.GOV. stuart.XXXX.NOAA.GOV. ( > 2004022921 10800 3600 604800 86400 ) > 86400 IN NS LUNA.XXXX.COMM.GOV. > 86400 IN NS AKALA.XXXX.COMM.GOV. > 86400 IN NS HALE.XXXX.COMM.GOV. > 86400 IN NS NWRNS.COMM.GOV. > 86400 IN NS SERNS.COMM.GOV. > 86400 IN NS MERNS.COMM.GOV. > 86400 IN NS MWRNS.COMM.GOV. > 2419200 IN MX 5 LUNA.XXXX.COMM.GOV. > 2419200 IN MX 10 AKALA.XXXX.COMM.GOV. > 2419200 IN MX 15 HALE.XXXX.COMM.GOV. >$ORIGIN XXXX.COMM.GOV. >LUNA 2419200 IN MX 5 LUNA.XXXX.COMM.GOV. > 2419200 IN MX 10 AKALA.XXXX.COMM.GOV. > 2419200 IN MX 15 HALE.XXXX.COMM.GOV. > 2419200 IN A 150.70.102.225 >AKALA 2419200 IN MX 5 LUNA.XXXX.COMM.GOV. > 2419200 IN MX 10 AKALA.XXXX.COMM.GOV. > 2419200 IN MX 15 HALE.XXXX.COMM.GOV. > 2419200 IN A 150.70.102.156 >KUKINI 2419200 IN A 150.70.102.143 >LEHUA 2419200 IN A 150.70.102.145 >MOLOKINI 2419200 IN A 150.70.102.158 >MIKI 2419200 IN A 150.70.102.224 >MONKU 2419200 IN A 150.70.102.157 >YANKEES 2419200 IN A 150.70.102.147 >NENE 2419200 IN A 150.70.102.227 >HALE 2419200 IN MX 5 LUNA.XXXX.COMM.GOV. > 2419200 IN MX 10 AKALA.XXXX.COMM.GOV. > 2419200 IN MX 15 HALE.XXXX.COMM.GOV. > 2419200 IN A 150.70.102.221 >LULU 2419200 IN A 150.70.102.219 >HAWAII 2419200 IN A 150.70.102.149 >TYRKER 2419200 IN A 150.70.102.140 >MAILHOST 2419200 IN CNAME LUNA.XXXX.COMM.GOV. >PILIKIA 2419200 IN A 150.70.102.222 >Q730R 2419200 IN A 150.70.102.160 >KONA 2419200 IN A 150.70.102.152 >EW 2419200 IN A 150.70.102.169 >HOLO 2419200 IN A 150.70.102.226 >KAKU 2419200 IN A 150.70.102.218 >RAPANUI 2419200 IN A 150.70.102.159 >KAIAPELE 2419200 IN A 150.70.102.136 >EWA 2419200 IN A 150.70.102.153 > >Some things were changed to protect the innocent.. > >Does anyone have any ideas on why local sendmail clients fail to deliver to the >backup mail server? > The fact that delivery works as expected from the outside implies that there is no DNS problem here. Sounds more like a sendmail problem to me. It's fairly common for local domains to follow a different "code" path (i.e. different rulesets, etc.) than remote domains, especially if you have a "MAIL_HUB" defined. - Kevin |