Re: dig with and without +norec

This is a discussion on Re: dig with and without +norec within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; > > I am assuming you work for an ISP... I would bet that one > of your customers was ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > DNS and Related Forums > Bind Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-29-2004
Ladislav Vobr
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: dig with and without +norec

>
> I am assuming you work for an ISP... I would bet that one
> of your customers was attempting to do something nasty on
> a US Air Force system and tripped one or more of the IDSs.
> Therefore your entire block of IPs probably got blocked
> at the AF perimeter.
>

yes, these things happen to isps on daily bases, and an isp has to deal
with them, I was trying to say, that bind could log such problems, when
servers are being retried again for hours, days, weeks, and instead of
wasting the resources on them, it might optionally stop doing it.

and my another point was why bind doesn't provide the data from the
cache, when it has them as a glue from parent to the recursive clients,
but only to non-recursive ones?

and another point is why the information about ip address of the server
the data came from has disappeared from the named_cache.db of bind9.2.3,
as I see from the DNS &Bind Book, 4th-edition 9.1.0 still had it.

Ladislav



Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0