This is a discussion on Re: Some ISP's having problem with my www subdomain within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; In article <c1mcbk$1un8$1@sf1.isc.org>, Jeff Lasman <blists@nobaloney.net> wrote: > Perfect? ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
In article <c1mcbk$1un8$1@sf1.isc.org>,
Jeff Lasman <blists@nobaloney.net> wrote: > Perfect? Will maybe to them. > > For lucidsage.com they return a list of 20 congtiguous A records, all on > the same network. That's because the zone name can't be a CNAME record, so they're forced to hard-code Akamai's IP addresses (with potential problems if Akamai renumbers their servers). > For www.lucidsage.com they return two CNAME records, one to > geo.premiumservices.yahoo.com, and one to premium.geo.yahoo.akadns.net > (akami?). It's not really two CNAME records, it's a chain of CNAMEs, which is permitted. This looks like a reasonable, modular setup -- if Yahoo changes the company that they contract with to host their "Premium Services", they don't have to tell all their customers to update their CNAME records. The customers point their aliases to something in the yahoo.com domain, and Yahoo points that name to the hosting vendor's domain. There's extra overhead in the chain of CNAMEs. But since Yahoo and Akamai are widely used hosting companies, I expect that these entries will often be found in caches, so the overhead is minimal. -- Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA |