This is a discussion on Re: question about caching & bind within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; I appreciate your reply, although the "toy-operating systems" comment was really unnecessary. It happens, servers get re-...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
I appreciate your reply, although the "toy-operating systems" comment
was really unnecessary. It happens, servers get re-booted, its a fact of life, but I still manage to sleep at night. I realize keeping the server up is the main goal, however my question still stands. Can I re-prime the cache as explained or is this is wasted effort. regards, Joel On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 06:57:00 +0000 (UTC), phn@icke-reklam.ipsec.nu wrote: >joe <bonggo@nospam.rocketmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, > >> I currently run a split DNS scenario and was wondering about caching >> to possibly improve performance. Is it possible or even advisable to >> have 1 or more DNS servers (say internally for arguments sake) utilize >> another separate bind caching only server ? My thinking is that if one >> or both of the servers is rebooted I lose the rich cache it has >> created and it would be nice to prime the lost cache quicker. If so >> what is considered best practice ? > >Keeping nameserver(s) running and avoiding forwarding might be >considered "best practice" > >"rebooting nameserver" ?? If you are thinking of toy-operating systems, >there is other places to discuss "how often" and "why" rebooting before crash. > >> thanks, >> Joel |