BIND 8 bug? (Protocol not supported)

This is a discussion on BIND 8 bug? (Protocol not supported) within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; Hi! I'm setting up a caching only server under BIND 8.3.7-REL, that comes with a fresh ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > DNS and Related Forums > Bind Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-16-2004
Pavel V. Knyazev
 
Posts: n/a
Default BIND 8 bug? (Protocol not supported)

Hi!

I'm setting up a caching only server under BIND 8.3.7-REL,
that comes with a fresh snapshot of FreeBSD 4.9 security branch.

Here's what i got. As long as BIND returns nothing for a first
query, it can be considered a bug, i think. Here we go (look also
at the bottom, there are some examples and comments):

9:30pm phobos:~# /usr/sbin/named -u bind -g bind -t /etc/namedb /etc/named.conf
9:30pm phobos:~# dig 194.in-addr.arpa ns

; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> 194.in-addr.arpa ns
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; res_nsend: Protocol not supported
9:31pm phobos:~# dig 194.in-addr.arpa ns

; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> 194.in-addr.arpa ns
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 52669
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 7, AUTHORITY: 7, ADDITIONAL: 7
;; QUERY SECTION:
;; 194.in-addr.arpa, type = NS, class = IN

;; ANSWER SECTION:
194.in-addr.arpa. 5D IN NS auth03.ns.uu.net.
194.in-addr.arpa. 5D IN NS tinnie.arin.net.
194.in-addr.arpa. 5D IN NS ns.ripe.net.
194.in-addr.arpa. 5D IN NS ns2.nic.fr.
194.in-addr.arpa. 5D IN NS sec1.apnic.net.
194.in-addr.arpa. 5D IN NS sec3.apnic.net.
194.in-addr.arpa. 5D IN NS sunic.sunet.se.

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
194.in-addr.arpa. 5D IN NS auth03.ns.uu.net.
194.in-addr.arpa. 5D IN NS tinnie.arin.net.
194.in-addr.arpa. 5D IN NS ns.ripe.net.
194.in-addr.arpa. 5D IN NS ns2.nic.fr.
194.in-addr.arpa. 5D IN NS sec1.apnic.net.
194.in-addr.arpa. 5D IN NS sec3.apnic.net.
194.in-addr.arpa. 5D IN NS sunic.sunet.se.

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
auth03.ns.uu.net. 1d23h59m24s IN A 198.6.1.83
tinnie.arin.net. 2h59m26s IN A 63.146.182.189
ns.ripe.net. 1d23h59m24s IN A 193.0.0.193
ns2.nic.fr. 3d23h59m24s IN A 192.93.0.4
sec1.apnic.net. 1d23h59m24s IN A 202.12.29.59
sec3.apnic.net. 1d23h59m24s IN A 202.12.28.140
sunic.sunet.se. 23h59m23s IN A 192.36.125.2

;; Total query time: 644 msec
;; FROM: phobos.surnet.ru to SERVER: 127.0.0.1
;; WHEN: Sat Feb 14 21:31:38 2004
;; MSG SIZE sent: 34 rcvd: 434

9:31pm phobos:~# dig 194.in-addr.arpa ns @ns.ripe.net.

; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> 194.in-addr.arpa ns @ns.ripe.net.
; (2 servers found)
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; res_nsend: Protocol not supported
9:34pm phobos:~# dig 194.in-addr.arpa ns @193.0.0.193

; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> 194.in-addr.arpa ns @193.0.0.193
; (1 server found)
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 11896
;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 7, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 6
;; QUERY SECTION:
;; 194.in-addr.arpa, type = NS, class = IN

;; ANSWER SECTION:
194.in-addr.arpa. 5D IN NS sec1.apnic.net.
194.in-addr.arpa. 5D IN NS sec3.apnic.net.
194.in-addr.arpa. 5D IN NS sunic.sunet.se.
194.in-addr.arpa. 5D IN NS auth03.ns.uu.net.
194.in-addr.arpa. 5D IN NS tinnie.arin.net.
194.in-addr.arpa. 5D IN NS ns.ripe.net.
194.in-addr.arpa. 5D IN NS ns2.nic.fr.

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
ns.ripe.net. 2D IN A 193.0.0.193
ns.ripe.net. 2D IN AAAA 2001:610:240:0:53::193
ns2.nic.fr. 4D IN A 192.93.0.4
sec1.apnic.net. 1H IN A 202.12.29.59
sec3.apnic.net. 1H IN A 202.12.28.140
sec3.apnic.net. 1H IN AAAA 2001:dc0:1:0:4777:140::

;; Total query time: 321 msec
;; FROM: phobos.surnet.ru to SERVER: 193.0.0.193
;; WHEN: Sat Feb 14 21:36:26 2004
;; MSG SIZE sent: 34 rcvd: 328

9:36pm phobos:~#

As far as i understand, there are issues with IPv6,
in particular BIND 8 doesn't know how to deal with
such sites (look up and see how it works with IPv6
of ns.ripe.net).

There are no problems with BIND 9 on the same machine.
It works just fine although it sees IPv6 RRs also.

Please, what is the cure for BIND 8?

--
Pavel V. Knyazev

Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0