Re: How can I log how much bandwidth is being used by lookups?

This is a discussion on Re: How can I log how much bandwidth is being used by lookups? within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; Thanks for the advice :) Matt :) -- Banging your head against a wall uses 150 calories an hour. "Simon Waters" &...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > DNS and Related Forums > Bind Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2004
Matt Bostock
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: How can I log how much bandwidth is being used by lookups?

Thanks for the advice :)

Matt :)
--
Banging your head against a wall uses 150 calories an hour.


"Simon Waters" <Simon@wretched.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:bveghq$qjv$1@sf1.isc.org...
> Kevin Darcy wrote:
> >
> > When I say "rough idea", I mean that the "sending TCP message" numbers
> > don't include TCP overhead, such as ACKs, retransmissions, and so forth.

> The only time I've seen the zone transfers be a bandwidth hog was the
> old Microsoft NT DNS server which would retry a zone transfer
> immediately if it had bad data in it - BIND is better behaved in these
> situations. But then I haven't tried slaving relay blocking lists.
>
> I'm assuming this wouldn't include the SOA queries to get the zone
> serial, or any queries for the zone in question (although I guess they
> can be estimated from the stats).
>
> On Linux you have counters in IPTables which can be used to gather
> information on bandwidth, as I know a local LUG group member uses it for
> billing purposes at the ISP he runs (overflowing the counters was a
> problem at the time), although it could end up a lot more arcane than
> Kevin's approach it would probably be relatively easy to account all
> traffic to port 53 on the master. I dare say other packet logging would
> do the trick as well (tcpdump dst port 53 and host ...)
>
> In these days of incremental zone transfer there is no reason they
> should be very big unless the zone changes dramatically.
>
>
> -- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFAGsTkGFXfHI9FVgYRApy9AJsHbBKytlQ/1ohfLMAM0Ur0iIferACcCzIy
> dtmOUYFPA/8angOfmCFXmcE=
> =mNWD
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>



---
No viruses found in this message.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.576 / Virus Database: 365 - Release Date: 30/1/04



Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0