This is a discussion on Re: Recommendations on integrating BIND and AD within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; Bell, William IT wrote: >In addition, he says that ISC doesn't properly expire leases in AD. "Mark ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Bell, William IT wrote:
>In addition, he says that ISC doesn't properly expire leases in AD. "Mark Damrose" <mdamrose@elgin.cc.il.us> replied, in part: >Actually, this is backwards. MS server improperly removes DDNS. >MS OSs don't properly remove entries they have made once they are >no longer needed (AD DHCP doesn't add clients, they self-register). That is not my experience with MS W2k DHCP. I have not seen a case where a DDNS entry was deleted improperly, but I admit that I am not a DHCP expert, and I do not have intimate knowledge of the subnets managed by the DHCP server. I have not heard a complaint from users or the subnet administrator about problems since we made a change to the DHCP configuration over a year ago. We have DHCP configured to register BOTH forward and reverse entries; the W2k workstations have self-registration disabled via group policy. >MS DNS servers assume that clients don't clean up after themselves, >and drop all DNS entries made dynamically. I am not sure I agree with this statement. In my case, Windows workstations are built from a common image, and that image has name cmtxpp I see that the W2k DHCP server registers machines with this unqualified name when the machine is first built; then the machine is registered with its proper fully qualified name after its TCP/IP configuration is complete. These unqualified nodenames remain in W2k DNS for about a week, and then they are deleted. I have not checked to see 1) for exactly how long these entries remain in DNS, nor 2) who deleted the entries (DNS or DHCP) Note that I have NOT enabled DNS scavenging on the W2k DNS, as I do not trust what it will do with some entries that were statically (manually) entered in DNS. >MS OSs assume the DNS >server is going to silently discard their DNS entries, so periodically >re-add them. I agree with this statement. The OSs do not check to see if the desired entry is already registered in DNS, so if the DDNS is refused by a BIND server, there is an unneeded entry in the Windows event log. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Barry S. Finkel Computing and Instrumentation Solutions Division Argonne National Laboratory Phone: +1 (630) 252-7277 9700 South Cass Avenue Facsimile:+1 (630) 252-4601 Building 222, Room D209 Internet: BSFinkel@anl.gov Argonne, IL 60439-4828 IBMMAIL: I1004994 |