Bluehost.com Web Hosting $6.95

Re: named appears to be "broken" -- (was: really whacky issues)

This is a discussion on Re: named appears to be "broken" -- (was: really whacky issues) within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* NAMED.CONF // $FreeBSD: src/etc/namedb/named.conf,...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > DNS and Related Forums > Bind Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2004
Mark
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: named appears to be "broken" -- (was: really whacky issues)

*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
NAMED.CONF
// $FreeBSD: src/etc/namedb/named.conf,v 1.13 2002/11/26 07:55:44 ume
Exp $
//
// Refer to the named.conf(5) and named(8) man pages for details. If
// you are ever going to setup a primary server, make sure you've
// understood the hairy details of how DNS is working. Even with
// simple mistakes, you can break connectivity for affected parties,
// or cause huge amount of useless Internet traffic.

options {
directory "/etc/namedb";
pid-file "/var/run/named/pid";

forwarders {
205.201.1.10;
};

recursion yes
}

zone "." {
type hint;
file "named.root";
};

zone "0.0.127.IN-ADDR.ARPA" {
type master;
file "localhost.rev";
};

// RFC 3152
zone
"1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0 .0.0.0.0.0.0.0.IP6.ARP
A"
{
type master;
file "localhost-v6.rev";
};

// RFC 1886 -- deprecated
zone
"1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0 .0.0.0.0.0.0.0.IP6.INT
" {
type master;
file "localhost-v6.rev";
};

zone "marknernberg.com" {
type master;
file "/etc/namedb/marknernberg.com.db";
};

RESOLV.CONF
nameserver 66.70.83.244
nameserver 80.249.99.30
nameserver 205.201.1.20


My hosts address is 151.201.141.231, the hostname is
"router.downtownhelpdesk.ath.cx"

Mark Nernberg


On Jan 18, 2004, at 7:20 PM, Edvard Tuinder wrote:

> *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm)
> Pro*
> According to Mark:
>> *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm)
>> Pro*
>> I have, as I said before, enabled recursion via the options in
>> named.conf
>>
>> when I run nslookup, it responds with the authoritative nameservers
>> for
>> mydomain.name, regardless of the domain name i request. the "Name"
>> output is domain.name.requested.mydomain.name -- indicating to me that
>> mydomain.name is being appended to requests.
>>
>> Whenever i run whois the output is "whois: com.whois-servers.net: No
>> address associated with hostname".
>>
>> So, just for the hell of it, I tried setting my hostname to null (""
>> --
>> empty quotes), even though it could possibly foul up other services.
>> The results were the same.
>>
>> Any help would be appreciated.

>
> nslookup is the wrong tool to diagnose DNS. It does not use the right
> library
> calls to be reliable.
>
> In your case, the appending of your local domain name, comes from the
> fact
> that nslookup uses your /etc/resolv.conf search path. And apparantely
> your
> zone has a wildcard which causes any query with nslookup to match.
>
> Try using dig for testing, or add a final . to your query (so query for
> domain.com. instead of domain.com).
>
> It'll probably show you that dns resolution itself works correctly.
> If it doesn't, post the real configuration and the addresses of the
> nameservers so we can test it ourselves. Do not edit the configuration,
> only omit any auth-keys for rndc and such.
>
>
> -Ed
>



Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0