This is a discussion on Re: delegation with multiple NS including localhost within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:33:31PM +0100, Sylvain Bertrand <Sylvain.Bertrand@supelec.fr> wrote=20 ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:33:31PM +0100,
Sylvain Bertrand <Sylvain.Bertrand@supelec.fr> wrote=20 a message of 66 lines which said: > Ok I get it. So the client's nameserver chooses the fastest between=20 > ns.foo.bar.org and ns.bar.org, right? The client's caching/forwarding nameserver chooses the fastest between ns.foo.bar.org and ns.bar.org, right. =20 > Since ns.bar.org has no data for foo.bar.org, isn't it useless to > delegate to itself? I do not understand this one. If it receives a delegation, it must be authoritative and it must have the data for foo.bar.org, either from a local file or from a zone transfer. |