Re: Relation memory usage to dumpfile of cache
This is a discussion on Re: Relation memory usage to dumpfile of cache within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; In article <bj25lf$sj5$1@sf1.isc.org>, Tom <klout@gmx.net> wrote: >I encountered ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
09-02-2003
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Relation memory usage to dumpfile of cache
In article <bj25lf$sj5$1@sf1.isc.org>, Tom <klout@gmx.net> wrote:
>I encountered extensive memory usage on one of our DNS, so I dumped >the cache to file. The size of the file is about 20MB while the memory >usage of named is about 230MB. is this normal? we're running bind >9.2.2 on RH8.0 with 512MB Ram. Sounds normal to me. I think the in-memory cache is a hash table, and they work best if they're sparsely populated. -- Barry Margolin, barry.margolin@level3.com Level(3), Woburn, MA *** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups. Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group. 
|
Linear Mode
