Re: Recent problems with Reverse DNS.

This is a discussion on Re: Recent problems with Reverse DNS. within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; Brett Simpson wrote: > On Wednesday 13 August 2003 02:38 pm, Kevin Darcy wrote: > > DNS doesn't ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > DNS and Related Forums > Bind Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-13-2003
Kevin Darcy
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Recent problems with Reverse DNS.

Brett Simpson wrote:

> On Wednesday 13 August 2003 02:38 pm, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> > DNS doesn't know from subnets. You could stuff everything into a single
> > 168.192.in-addr.arpa zone if you wanted. And if you don't care what the
> > reverse lookups resolve to, you could populate it with a single wildcard
> > PTR record. Or use $GENERATE to just populate it with generic names.

>
> I created a 172 reverse zone file with the following entry and it works great.
>
> *.172.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR generic-reverse-172.


Well, technically RFC 1918 only reserved 172.16/12. You could end up accidentally
blinding yourself to legitimate reverse lookups if you define 172.in-addr.arpa.


- Kevin




Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0