This is a discussion on Re: Recent problems with Reverse DNS. within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; Brett Simpson <simpsonb@hillsboroughcounty.org> wrote: >>Three weeks ago our internal clients were able to connect ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Brett Simpson <simpsonb@hillsboroughcounty.org> wrote: >>Three weeks ago our internal clients were able to connect to hosts by ip >>address quickly. Then we started noticing slow connection to various internal >>host by IP address. If I add a host entry of my workstation to the server I'm >>connecting to then things are fast again. Sounds like a Reverse DNS problem. >>So I updated our db.cache file (which contains the root servers) on both DNS >>server and things seemed to be fast again after restarting Bind. But then 10 >>minutes later things slowed down again. >>Our hosts that have public IPs with FQDN are fine. Just the internal hosts >>have problems. >Barry Margolin <barry.margolin () level3 ! com> wrote: >If the internal hosts are using private addresses, then you need to have >local zone files for the reverse domains. The nameservers that the RFC >1918 reverse domains are delegated to don't always respond in a timely >fashion. Hmm... I have a large number of internal private subnets. Making these local zone file for reverse lookups would take some time considering I have about 100 subnets. Is their some sort of short cut to the process? Like for example is there a setting in Bind 9 that will allow me to say that any host on the 192.168.60.x subnet will get a reverse response (a dummy one) without having to specify every host and IP address in the zone? Or if that's not possible how about a utility that will allow me to generate a reverse zone file quickly based on the subnet I give it? |