This is a discussion on Re: FQDN within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 phaniraj ranganath wrote: > > I want to know why the FQDN cann't ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 phaniraj ranganath wrote: > > I want to know why the FQDN cann't be more than 256 characters > & the name at any node in Internet Domain name space cann't be more > than 63 characters? The length limit is 255 not 256 I believe. The reason is that rfc1034 says so, read the rfc's for more background, but it says "to ease implementation". > Is there any restriction in the number of levels > in Internet i.e. from root servers how many levels can the structure > of internet span? As far as I know only the implied limit from the length restrictions which I make 128 labels of one character. However you would need to check the resolution algorithms to see if this would break the resolvers in common use, as I suspect some might give up before they had got to resolving a name involving substantially more levels than possible. It is possible one of the RFCs implies a lower limit. The names with most labels I've seen in use are inverse queries for IPv6 addresses, however these are broken into chunks, and so don't have anywhere near as many levels of delegation as appearances might suggest. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/Iq8PGFXfHI9FVgYRAp2mAJ0VBymPEggGCaIM9WtEUF4cZtpLgg Cg12qW KpcyLhqhD5yFMpUfFuRlSJA= =795g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |