Re: Minimum TTL question

This is a discussion on Re: Minimum TTL question within the Bind Users forums, part of the DNS and Related Forums category; At 11:59 AM 7/1/2003 -0500, Pete Ehlke wrote: >On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 04:28:...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > DNS and Related Forums > Bind Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-01-2003
Robert Gahl
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Minimum TTL question

At 11:59 AM 7/1/2003 -0500, Pete Ehlke wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 04:28:02PM +0000, Barry Margolin wrote:
> >
> > Conceivably there may be other DNS servers that raise short TTLs up to some
> > minimum, but I haven't heard of them and it would be a violation of the
> > protocol (conversely, there's nothing too wrong with a ceiling on the TTL,
> > since cached data can be discarded any time for a variety of reasons,
> > although it would be quite antisocial to set the ceiling too low).
> >

>AOL are widely rumoured to ignore 'low' TTLs and raise them up to some
>(equally rumoured) minimum, though I've never heard a definitive answer
>from AOL as to whether they actually do this, and if so, what the value
>of 'low' is.
>
>I do note that if it's true, it is a practice that, if widely deployed,
>would render AOL's MX load balancing, for which they no doubt pay an
>exhorbitant ammount of money, useless.


Well, here is what started the question in my mind. We do use Foundry
hardware in our two data centers, and they do a reasonable job of load
balancing using DNS as the mechanism. Because I "thought" there was a
practical minimum of 15 to 30 minutes, that's what I set it to.

But, when I observe what traffic does when we do a "DNS roll" (this is
where we want to take one of the data centers off-line for maintenance, so
we change the DNS to point to a specific data center), 4 hours after the
change, I'll still be seeing one access a second at the "down" center. A
majority of traffic moves, yes, but there is still this "refuses to move"
traffic that bothers me.

That leads me to believe that it isn't just "AOL" doing this :( Thus the
question of a practical minimum TTL.

I guess, too, while it use to be bad form to have a tiny TTL, it is
becoming less so, with the advent of hardware like the 3DNS, and people's
DNS hardware is just getting better at handling the "update" load?

Thanks for the feedback, btw. It helps A LOT.


===
Bob Gahl Bicycle (Ryan Vanguard) Mobile || @
ARPA/Internet: bgahl@bawcsa.org || !_ \
URL: http://www.bawcsa.org/bgahl/ || (*)-~--+--(*)
"Sahn joong moe low ful how jee yah ching wong" - "When the
mountain has no tigers, the monkey will also declare himself
king." Chinese Proverb


Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0