This is a discussion on Running java based video (webcam) through apache within the Apache Web Server forums, part of the Web Server and Related Forums category; I have an apache 2.0.52 webserver running my website and I have an internet webcam connected to my ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
I have an apache 2.0.52 webserver running my website and I have an
internet webcam connected to my LAN, accessible via login session from the internet on port 85. Some hosts do not allow port 85, so I want to run the webcam on port 80 which is controlled by Apache. The webcam works at port 80 and 85, but my router points all port 80 traffic to apache and all port 85 traffic to the webcam. I have therefore added a proxy in httpd.conf: #start extra lines to run webcam on 192.168.1.20 through port 80 ProxyPass /webcam/ http://192.168.1.20/ ProxyPassReverse /webcam/ http://192.168.1.20/ #end extra lines to run webcam on 192.168.1.20 through port 80 The client on the internet can communicate with the webcam through apache, the traffic is working, until the java based video itself is transmitted; the java symbol starts in client window, but dies. This has been confirmed on several internet clients. What is missing? THX for any hints! Ralf -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
|
|||
|
Davide Bianchi wrote:
> On 2007-01-23, Ralf Hartings <webben@spray.se> wrote: >> apache, the traffic is working, until the java based video itself is >> transmitted; the java symbol starts in client window, but dies. This has >> been confirmed on several internet clients. > > Something make me think that the java client (applet or wathever) has > the _internal_ ip address hardwired, so it doesn't work on the Internet. > If you have such proble I wrote sometimes ago an alternativa Java applet > that works fine on most webcam. > > Davide > Thanks Davide for the reply! It works great though if I use the port 85 (not via apache) via my router to the webcam internal IP address. Doesn't this mean that it looks as if apache itself has some limitations/restrictions? Ralf -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |