This is a discussion on Apache clustering within the Apache Web Server forums, part of the Web Server and Related Forums category; Hello everyone, I'm new to clustering application. One of our customers, need an apache clustering environment. How I can ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Hello everyone,
I'm new to clustering application. One of our customers, need an apache clustering environment. How I can realize that ? The environment needs also tomcat. Shortly, I've 4 unix hosts, which have the LAMP (linux, apache....)configuration, and now I need clustering between the 4 apache (with tomcat support). Ideas? Thanks. PS: Tomcat + Gomba |
|
|||
|
Davide visto che ci siamo parliamo italiano :fear:
Mi serve che se muore uno, uno tra gli altri 3 deve rispondere. Fine. "Davide Bianchi" <davideyeahsure@onlyforfun.net> ha scritto nel messaggio news:slrnenqfkl.3ck.davideyeahsure@fogg.onlyforfun .net... > On 2006-12-11, Nicola Liquori <crystaldamage@libero.it> wrote: >> One of our customers, need an apache clustering environment. > > And that would mean what exactly? Does he wants 4 servers running more > or less the same thing with a load balancer in front or does he want > 2 groups of 2 servers each group running his own things in a > hi-availability > configuration? > >> How I can realize that ? > > First of all, clear up your mind and your customer's. Then research > documentation on what you want to do. > > Davide > > -- > It's a lot less painful and more fun to learn from someone else's > experience than on you own skin. - Bob Arnold |
|
|||
|
Well, sorry for italian words.
Ok, so load balancer can do that. There is also a software solution? For example: a software that I install onto a non-grouped machine (like another server) that is able to decide which server is dead or not ? (like load balancer...) Thanks. "Davide Bianchi" <davideyeahsure@onlyforfun.net> ha scritto nel messaggio news:slrnenqkvq.3ck.davideyeahsure@fogg.onlyforfun .net... > On 2006-12-11, Nicola Liquori <crystaldamage@libero.it> wrote: >> Davide visto che ci siamo parliamo italiano :fear: > > Well, as long as we are on a public -international- newsgroup, I think > that using english is better. So if I say some crackpot things, someone > else can correct me. > >> Mi serve che se muore uno, uno tra gli altri 3 deve rispondere. > > Well, both HA clustering and load balancing can do that, in the HA > system the two machines 'talks' with each other and if one of the two > doesn't respond anymore the other one assume that his buddy is dead and > will start all the services that were run by the deceased, in the > load balancing view the load balancer does the job _and_ he can also > distribute multiple requests to different machines depending on the > load of the single machine. So it mostly depends how much you want > to spend and how many connections you want to support. > > Load balancer can be cheap, they can be simply rented by and someone > else can do the configuration. > > Davide > > -- > The Edsel. New Coke. Windows 2000. All mandatory case studies for > bizschool > students in 2020. > -- Bear Giles (in a LinuxToday post) |