mod_proxy on windows not working (but works on another one)

Hello. I'm trying to set up a remote Windows machine like I have my
local one set up. The local one works, the remote one doesn't. I'm
setting up a reverse proxy in httpd.conf, and the proxied url produces
the following error:

proxy: No protocol handler was valid for the URL /fb_stock_demo/
stockList. If you are using a DSO version of mod_proxy, make sure the
proxy submodules are included in the configuration using LoadModule.

In httpd.conf, I have mod_proxy, mod_proxy_connect and mod_proxy_http
all enabled (I uncommented those lines). I also have tried specifying
the absolute paths for the modules instead of the relative "modules/
mod_proxy_http.so" etc. But it still gives me this error, as if I'd
made no change. It's as if it isn't really enabling the sub-modules,
but wouldn't it complain if it couldn't load them?

Thanks for any help. I'm on a deadline for Monday and this very
frustrating detail is holding up the rest of the project.

- Jake

Actually, this may be simpler than that. I'm not sure that the
httpd.conf belongs to the apache process running. Apparently there's
another one running and I wasn't aware of it. So the answer is I'm a
fool.

On May 4, 12:03 am, jakemiles <jacob.mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello. I'm trying to set up a remote Windows machine like I have my
> local one set up. The local one works, the remote one doesn't. I'm
> setting up a reverse proxy in httpd.conf, and the proxied url produces
> the following error:
>
> proxy: No protocol handler was valid for the URL /fb_stock_demo/
> stockList. If you are using a DSO version of mod_proxy, make sure the
> proxy submodules are included in the configuration using LoadModule.
>
> In httpd.conf, I have mod_proxy, mod_proxy_connect and mod_proxy_http
> all enabled (I uncommented those lines). I also have tried specifying
> the absolute paths for the modules instead of the relative "modules/
> mod_proxy_http.so" etc. But it still gives me this error, as if I'd
> made no change. It's as if it isn't really enabling the sub-modules,
> but wouldn't it complain if it couldn't load them?
>
> Thanks for any help. I'm on a deadline for Monday and this very
> frustrating detail is holding up the rest of the project.
>
> - Jake