This is a discussion on CacheIgnoreCacheControl based on user? within the Apache Web Server forums, part of the Web Server and Related Forums category; Can CacheIgnoreCacheControl be set based on who is viewing the page? i.e. allow "CacheIgnoreCacheControl on" for people ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
<jergendutch@gmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:9f024c9f-84a7-4416-bec7-567bd9456cb1@p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com... > Can CacheIgnoreCacheControl be set based on who is viewing the page? > i.e. allow "CacheIgnoreCacheControl on" for people from 10.x, but off > for everyone else? http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod...recachecontrol Given the context 'server' and 'vhost': NO Why on earth do you even consider !? HansH |
|
|||
|
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod...heignorecachec...
> Given the context 'server' and 'vhost': NO > > Why on earth do you even consider !? > > HansH Well I need to let myself expire items from the cache, but not people from outside. I could do this with a separate nearly identical virtualhost entry, but would this cause problems for mod_disk_cache? |
|
|||
|
<jergendutch@gmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:2f9e2cad-fb2f-44eb-be43-ded1f81a92bc@k2g2000hse.googlegroups.com... >> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod...heignorecachec... >> Given the context 'server' and 'vhost': NO >> >> Why on earth do you even consider !? > > Well I need to let myself expire items from the cache > but not people from outside. AFAIK this directive has opposite effect ... .... instead of enforcing cache misses, it makes cacheable what should not be cached. Hans |
|
|||
|
On 22 Jan., 15:34, "HansH" <ha...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> <jergendu...@gmail.com> schreef in berichtnews:2f9e2cad-fb2f-44eb-be43-ded1f81a92bc@k2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...>>http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod...heignorecachec... > >> Given the context 'server' and 'vhost': NO > > >> Why on earth do you even consider !? > > > Well I need to let myself expire items from the cache > > but not people from outside. > > AFAIK this directive has opposite effect ... > ... instead of enforcing cache misses, > it makes cacheable what should not be cached. > > Hans Yes, that's what I want.. |