Re: apache 1.3.27 to 1.3.29 upgrade problems

This is a discussion on Re: apache 1.3.27 to 1.3.29 upgrade problems within the Apache Web Server forums, part of the Web Server and Related Forums category; perhaps the apache was build using tarball and not RPM ? "Vigilance Monitoring" <no_spam@aracnet.com> wrote ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Web Server and Related Forums > Apache Web Server

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2004
Webmaster \(N.S\)
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: apache 1.3.27 to 1.3.29 upgrade problems

perhaps the apache was build using tarball and not RPM ?

"Vigilance Monitoring" <no_spam@aracnet.com> wrote in message news:c3i49501tgl@enews2.newsguy.com...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> RH Linux is rapidly becoming my least favorite UNIX flavor :(
>
> I have been trying to do what ought to be a trivial RH 7.3 apache
> upgrade but after over a week and many, many hours reading docs and
> forum threads I'm still not there.
>
> After a *LOT* of pain, I think I have the basic apache stuff running.
> I'm now having problems where PerlModule won't load which causes
> apache to not start.
>
> Apache was initially built by someone else and I am guessing that
> mod_perl was installed statically. I'm pretty sure I have the DSO
> stuff working but mod_perl.c isn't loading. In fact, I cannot find
> mod_perl.c anywhere on the system but I never get any complaints
> about it. libperl.so is there though.
>
> At this point I am really in need of some *HELPFUL* suggestions.
> Being advised to go read the documentation is no longer productive or
> helpful.
>
> The apache 1.3.27 code is running fine although I had to shut off SSL
> due to skiddie attacks (hence the reason for upgrading). At this
> point I am totally lost and totally frustrated and for the first time
> in my life I understand why Microsoft is actually preferred by many
> IT managers. I am a relative newbie to Linux but have been
> administering UNIX servers for 20 years.
>
> Helpful replies would be greatly appreciated.
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
> Comment: foobar
>
> iQA/AwUBQFyT6VPfRV42MJPXEQLDEACdF8WgAEKv/KemSDmrnrweDyLm4oIAn1Pt
> ewiny2AU4TIaoJRZcov9Xgfi
> =vQxj
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0