Re: [AMaViS-user] bypass spam check for domain

Gary V escribi=F3:
> On 3/27/08, Miguel wrote:
> =

>> Hi to all, i got a questiong regarding the spam_lovars_maps static maps,
>> i undestand that if i want to bypass all spam check for a particular
>> recipient/domains, i just need to list them in @spam_lovers_maps,
>> however, i found this tutorial
>>
>> http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/bypassing.html#9
>>
>> where it says that you have to do it with
>>
>> @bypass_spam_checks_maps
>>
>> and additional to add them to @spam_lovars_maps
>>
>> i just want to do the right thing.
>> What is the "official", recommended way to do this?
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> =

>
> With @spam_lovers_maps, the message is still processed by spamassassin
> and a score is assigned, but the message is passed regardless of the
> score. With @bypass_spam_checks_maps, the message is usually not
> processed by spamassassin, so this saves processing power. However,
> when the message is addressed to multiple recipients, and the
> recipients disagree whether scanning should occur or not, the message
> will be scanned. =


What is that mean?, that i have @example.com for bypass spam check and i =

also have another setting somewhere for xx@example.com to do spam checks?

> There is the possibility in this case that the
> recipient(s) in the @bypass_spam_checks_maps will not get a copy of
> the message. Possibly the best way to set this up so you save as much
> processing as possible, but still ensure that spam is passed, is to
> include the recipients in both maps.
>
> One other thing to consider however. For any messages that are not
> scanned by spamassassin, those messages will not included in the
> messages that are learned by Bayes (assuming autolearn is active). So,
> you decide.
>
> Another thing to consider. Depending on your default kill_level and
> your quarantine setup, spam that is passed to recipients in
> @spam_lovers_maps may also have a copy of the message sent to
> quarantine. Assuming one is using default static lookups, consider
> also creating a @spam_kill_level_maps where the spam lovers are given
> a high kill_level (which prevents quarantine), e.g.:
>
> @spam_kill_level_maps =3D (
> { 'user1@example.org' =3D> 9999,
> '.example.com' =3D> 9999 }, # those in @spam_lovers_maps
> \$sa_kill_level_deflt, # catchall default - everyone not in @spam_love=
rs_maps
> );
>
> =

Ok, i do not quarantine any messages ($QUARANTINEDIR =3D undef), so i =

guess the @spam_kill_lelvel_maps is not necesary.
All is clearer now,
Thanks Gary .


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216...et/marketplace
_______________________________________________
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/