Re: [AMaViS-user] p0f-analyzer load balancing problem

This is a discussion on Re: [AMaViS-user] p0f-analyzer load balancing problem within the Amavis User forums, part of the Anti-Spam and Anti-Virus Related Forums category; Bartek, > > > $policy_bank{'MX00'} = { > > > forward_method => 'smtp:[10.10.3.9]:10025', > > > $...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Anti-Spam and Anti-Virus Related Forums > Amavis User

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007
Mark Martinec
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [AMaViS-user] p0f-analyzer load balancing problem

Bartek,

> > > $policy_bank{'MX00'} = {
> > > forward_method => 'smtp:[10.10.3.9]:10025',
> > > $os_fingerprint_method =>'p0f:[*]:1234',
> > > };


Robert Brooks wrote:
> > I think that should be * not[*], but I'm willing to be wrong.


Thanks, correct. I have an incorrect example, sorry.

> Well, in that case it works better, but still not as it should be:
>
> Nov 29 10:17:52 scanner00 amavis[6782]: (06782-03) dynamic destination:
> p0f:*:1234 -> p0f:[10.10.3.244]:1234
>
> 10.10.3.244 is actually ip number of scanner00, so it is trying to ask
> itself?


I just tried it here, and it works as expected, the UPD packet was
sent to an IP address from which a connect to amavisd port 10024 came
from. Are you sure you connected from a host other than 10.10.3.244?

The IP address to which an UDP query packet is send should be
the same as reported in the following two log entries (log level 5):

(88442-11) Net::Server: 2007/11/29-16:39:37 CONNECT TCP
Peer: "10.0.4.95:54292" Local: "10.0.4.8:10024"
(88442-11) loaded base policy bank
(88442-11) lookup_ip_acl (inet_acl):
key="10.0.4.95" matches "10.0.4.95", result=1

> Also, I can see now something like that:
>
> Nov 29 10:17:52 scanner00 amavis[6782]: (06782-02) (!)loading policy
> bank "MX00": unknown field ""
> Nov 29 10:17:52 scanner00 amavis[6782]: (06782-02) loaded policy bank
> "MX00"
>
> while my MX00 policy bank is:
>
> $interface_policy{'10049'} = 'MX00';
> $interface_policy{'10024'} = 'MX01';
> $policy_bank{'MX00'} = {
> forward_method => 'smtp:[10.10.3.9]:10025',
> $os_fingerprint_method =>'p0f:*:1234',
> };
> $policy_bank{'MX01'} = {
> forward_method => 'smtp:[10.10.3.9]:10025',
> $os_fingerprint_method => 'p0f:*:1234',
> };
>
> What is going on here? Am I missing something?


Syntax:

$policy_bank{'MX00'} = {
forward_method => 'smtp:[10.10.3.9]:10025',
os_fingerprint_method => 'p0f:*:1234',
};

(no dollar, hash keys are strings, not variables to be evaluated
to an empty string)

Mark

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0