Re: [AMaViS-user] allow mail to reach spamcop

This is a discussion on Re: [AMaViS-user] allow mail to reach spamcop within the Amavis User forums, part of the Anti-Spam and Anti-Virus Related Forums category; On 8/10/07, Jo Rhett wrote: > Okay, I've been playing around with the spam_lovers maps, and no ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Anti-Spam and Anti-Virus Related Forums > Amavis User

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-11-2007
Gary V
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [AMaViS-user] allow mail to reach spamcop

On 8/10/07, Jo Rhett wrote:
> Okay, I've been playing around with the spam_lovers maps, and no matter
> what I try based on examples I find around the net, mail to abuse
> contacts and to spamcop continues to checked and rejected.
>
> Someone please clue me in.
>
> Things I have tried:
>
> spam_lovers_maps => [@spam_lovers_maps, [qw( .spamcop.net )]];
>
> spam_lovers_maps => [@spam_lovers_maps, [qw( .spam.spamcop.net )]];
>
> spam_lovers_maps => [@spam_lovers_maps, [qw( @spam.spamcop.net )]];
>
> spam_lovers_maps => [@spam_lovers_maps, [qw( *@spam.spamcop.net )]];
>
> (the latter didn't say it would work anywhere, I just tried it anyway)
>
> I'd also like to allow any spam sent to abuse@....
>
> --
> Jo Rhett


The way you are constructing these statements gives the impression
that you already have configured a list of recipients in
@spam_lovers_maps and now you are trying to use this existing list in
a policy bank, along with a couple additional recipients. Is this the
case? Or are you simply trying make those two recipients spam lovers?
It appears you may be confusing a policy bank key with a map.

One possible form (not in a policy bank):
@spam_lovers_maps = ([ qw( abuse@ .spamcop.net )]);

amavisd.conf-sample shows other forms.

If you already have @spam_lovers_maps configured, one suggestion might
be to add those two additional addresses to it and don't include the
spam_lovers_maps key in a policy bank (if that's what you were trying
to do).

Are you using SQL? If so, a catchall user with spam_lover "N" would
have precedence over this static hash.

--
Gary V

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0