This is a discussion on Re: [AMaViS-user] Using amavis-new for compliance? within the Amavis User forums, part of the Anti-Spam and Anti-Virus Related Forums category; Jeremy Laidman wrote: > In fact it's possible that I wouldn't actually need a separate amavisd. If I &...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Jeremy Laidman wrote:
> In fact it's possible that I wouldn't actually need a separate amavisd. If I > have amavis include SA headers (X-Spam-Status) and have an SA rule that > matches a word but has a score of 0. Then in amavis, after SA has done its > thing, I just look for my special non-compliance test marker in the > X-Spam-Status header. This is not going to work because I don't SA-scan outbound mail. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/ |