This is a discussion on Re: [AMaViS-user] SA whitelist usage within the Amavis User forums, part of the Anti-Spam and Anti-Virus Related Forums category; On 12/14/06, Gary V <lists@johnmecham.com> wrote: > I would get rid of this: > &...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On 12/14/06, Gary V <lists@johnmecham.com> wrote:
> I would get rid of this: > > smtpd_client_restrictions = > reject_rbl_client sbl.spamhaus.org, > reject_rbl_client relays.ordb.org, > reject_rbl_client blackholes.easynet.nl > > and move these to after reject_unauth_destination > > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = > reject_unauth_pipelining, > permit_mynetworks, > permit_sasl_authenticated, > reject_non_fqdn_recipient, > reject_unknown_recipient_domain, > reject_unauth_destination, > reject_rbl_client sbl.spamhaus.org, > reject_rbl_client relays.ordb.org, > reject_rbl_client blackholes.easynet.nl, > permit > > Gary V > I did what you told me, and it seems that the emails are ok now, how can I confirm this is not temporary working well? This is a header from an email now: X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at domain.com.ar X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.157 tagged_above=2 required=6.31 tests=[AWL=-0.946, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.841, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_TITLE_EMPTY=0.214, RCVD_IN_DSBL=2.6, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=2.046] X-Spam-Score: 3.157 X-Spam-Level: *** Thanks! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?p...rge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/ |