Re: [AMaViS-user] banned files questions

This is a discussion on Re: [AMaViS-user] banned files questions within the Amavis User forums, part of the Anti-Spam and Anti-Virus Related Forums category; junk@path.berkeley.edu wrote: >> you deliver messages tagged as "undesirable" to a quarantine. This may ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Anti-Spam and Anti-Virus Related Forums > Amavis User

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-27-2006
mouss
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [AMaViS-user] banned files questions

junk@path.berkeley.edu wrote:
>> you deliver messages tagged as "undesirable" to a quarantine. This may be
>> - a junk folder
>> - spam headers added to message (then MUAs are configured to use these
>> to eithe put the message in a special folder or to just allow user to
>> order messages so that they can focus on untagged messages first).
>> - tagged subject. variant of the above, but I don't like it.
>> - quarantine server (another pop/imap server). dbmail may be handy here.
>> - webmail
>> - web quarantine (mailzu for instance)
>> - amavisd-new quarantine
>> ...
>>

>
> I want a legit sender to know their message was quarantined. Quarantine
> makes it so the recipients know something was up (and retrieve if
> desired).


Let's not debate the defintion of a quarantine. To me, an IMAP Junk
folder is a quarantine. reviewing my previous post:

- junk folder: This is an IMAP folder that the user sees in his MUA.
- spam headers: the message is seen by the user. it is up to the user to
create rules in his MUA to flter these
- tagged subject: the message is seen by the user. it is up to the user
to create rules in his MUA to flter these
- webmail: the user has access to his webmail and thus to his quarantine
- webmail quarantine: the user has access to his quarantine

so 5 out of 7 of the proposed mechanisms provide direct access by the
recipient. Choose for yourself...

I myself use IMAP folders, and I check my Junk folder periodically. I
use .Junk, .Junk.Trash and .Junk.Error folders. The .Error is for false
positives, the .Trash is for confirmed spam, including False negatives.
server scripts use these for filter training.

> Sending a rejection code lets the senders know something was
> up without sending bounces to innocent bystanders.
>


As a recipient of a lot of "rejection code", I can only tell you this:
stop it. If you think that fighting spam is as easy as rejecting mail,
then you are wrong. You are free to rject mail if you think it is spam,
but you are responsible of your own errors. As one my teachers used to
say: you can cheat, but don't get caught.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?p...rge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0