This is a discussion on Re: [AMaViS-user] Wow! CPU overload... within the Amavis User forums, part of the Anti-Spam and Anti-Virus Related Forums category; I'd hesitate to call a load average of 1.02 an "overload". There is a really good ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
I'd hesitate to call a load average of 1.02 an "overload".
There is a really good explanation (well it certainly helped me!) of what is actually being measured in a series of articles available at: http://www.teamquest.com/resources/gunther/ldavg1.shtml and http://www.teamquest.com/resources/gunther/ldavg2.shtml To quote a point these articles make: 'The "load" is not the utilization but the total queue length'. So you can't treat the averages as 1.0 = 100% CPU utilisation. cheers Paul On 03/08/2005, at 7:36 AM, Gary V wrote: > Matt wrote: > > >> Hi all, >> > > >> We've got two relay servers setup (relay1 and relay2) and its working >> fine, but the mail coming in is amazing. I'm glad we went with >> the two >> relay server solution instead of everything on one box. >> > > >> Each of these relay servers is a 3 GIG processor with 1 GB ram. >> > > >> However..... >> > > >> relay1: load averages: 1.02, 0.84, 0.83 >> relay2: load averages: 0.50, 0.60, 0.62 >> > > >> They are both usually closer to .80, at this snapshot relay1 was >> taking a >> bit of a hit while relay2 was not. >> > > >> Anyway, email from off our network is taking anywhere between 30 >> seconds >> and 10 minutes to be delivered. I've got 5 amavis processes >> running by >> default (set in master.conf and amavisd.conf). >> > > >> Do I need to increase the amount of processes, or add 2 more relay >> servers >> into the pool? (If need be we can make it four relay servers >> instead of >> two). >> > > >> Any ideas? Thanks! >> -Matt >> > > I'm sure others will have better ideas, but did you read > http://www.heinlein-support.de/upload/martinec.pdf ? Read pages 28 and > 29. I think you will find that with a GIG of RAM, you could easily > go to > 10 or 15, and if you add another GIG - that would be good. Did you > spend some > time optimizing SpamAssassin (and Bayes)? Can we see your local.cf > please. > Are you using custom SpamAssassin rule sets? What is your memory > usage like > at the moment? Are you using Pyzor? > > Gary V > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies > from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, > informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to > speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click > _______________________________________________ > AMaViS-user mailing list > AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/amavis-user > AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 > AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/ > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/ |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|