This is a discussion on Lookup failure within the alt.comp.mail.qmail forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; I don't know anything about qmail or running a mailing list. I tho't I would try to poke ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
I don't know anything about qmail or running a mailing list. I tho't I
would try to poke this in here because nothing else works. I haven't dutifully read some posts here to familiarize myself with your group; sorry. I'm on 2 mailing lists. One of them, kplug@kernel-panic.org uses ezmlm qmail and I don't know what the other, junkfaxes-l@junkfax.com uses. My problem is with the kplug list, from which my mail be delayed by hours or days or bounced because it has been in the queue too long. This has been the case for quite some time and I've been investigating it more actively lately and posting to the mailing list group for others who might have problems as well. No one else seems to notice anything going on or concurring with my complaints. As far as I know, I never have mail delayed or bounced by the junkfaxes daemon, which is a more active list, nor have any friends been bounced that I know of. What I mean by delayed is that I can tell from the headers when the item got to kplug from the person sending it, and when I got it from kplug. Recently the kplug daemon informed me that 18 items had bounced [over time] and provided me with the bounce for one of them. It does that as a form of probe to drop me if that bounces, and also to tell me which message items I didn't get and how to go get them. <snip> Return-Path: <> Received: (qmail 20956 invoked for bounce); 5 Nov 2003 09:36:09 -0000 Date: 5 Nov 2003 09:36:09 -0000 From: MAILER-DAEMON@sparkplug.kernel-panic.org To: kplug-list-return-65662-@kernel-panic.org Subject: failure notice Hi. This is the qmail-send program at sparkplug.kernel-panic.org. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <munged@earthlink.net>: CNAME lookup failed temporarily. (#4.4.3) I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long. <snip> In addition, I did a little investigation of earthlink.net at dnsstuff: http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsre...=earthlink.net <snip> INFO MX Record Your 11 MX records are: 5 mx10.earthlink.net. [TTL=1800] IP=207.217.120.241 [TTL=1800] 5 mx1.earthlink.net. [TTL=1800] IP=207.217.125.16 [TTL=1800] 5 mx3.earthlink.net. [TTL=1800] IP=207.217.125.18 [TTL=1800] 5 mx4.earthlink.net. [TTL=1800] IP=207.217.125.19 [TTL=1800] 5 mx5.earthlink.net. [TTL=1800] IP=207.217.125.20 [TTL=1800] 5 mx6.earthlink.net. [TTL=1800] IP=207.217.125.21 [TTL=1800] 5 mx7.earthlink.net. [TTL=1800] IP=207.217.125.22 [TTL=1800] 5 mx01.earthlink.net. [TTL=1800] IP=207.217.120.29 [TTL=1800] 5 mx07.earthlink.net. [TTL=1800] IP=207.217.120.132 [TTL=1800] 5 mx08.earthlink.net. [TTL=1800] IP=207.217.120.201 [TTL=1800] 5 mx09.earthlink.net. [TTL=1800] IP=207.217.120.216 [TTL=1800] <snip> FAIL Connect to mail servers ERROR: I could not connect to one or more of your mailservers: mx10.earthlink.net: Timed out [Last data sent: QUIT ] mx1.earthlink.net: Timed out [Last data sent: QUIT ] mx3.earthlink.net: Timed out [Last data sent: QUIT ] mx7.earthlink.net: Timed out [Last data sent: QUIT ] mx01.earthlink.net: Timed out [Last data sent: QUIT ] mx09.earthlink.net: Timed out [Last data sent: QUIT ] </snip> That looks pretty bad to me. If the poor little qmail ezmlm has to struggle with that, it might give up before it can find one. It shouldn't be that hard. But, somehow the junkfaxes-l copes with whatever that problem is. Besides 'rapping' about this in the kplug list, I've tried to get a little response in the EL support group earthlink.support.email but nothing is happening there either. Do any of you qmail folks know anything I might pass on to the kplug list guru to help it cope with the earthlink situation better? -- Mike Easter |
|
|||
|
In article <dXHub.5661$sb4.2213@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink. net>, Mike Easter wrote:
><snip> > Return-Path: <> > Received: (qmail 20956 invoked for bounce); 5 Nov 2003 09:36:09 -0000 > Date: 5 Nov 2003 09:36:09 -0000 > From: MAILER-DAEMON@sparkplug.kernel-panic.org > To: kplug-list-return-65662-@kernel-panic.org > Subject: failure notice > > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at sparkplug.kernel-panic.org. > I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following > addresses. > This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. ] > ><snip> > FAIL Connect to mail servers ERROR: I could not connect to one or more > of your mailservers: > mx10.earthlink.net: Timed out [Last data sent: QUIT ] > mx1.earthlink.net: Timed out [Last data sent: QUIT ] > mx3.earthlink.net: Timed out [Last data sent: QUIT ] > mx7.earthlink.net: Timed out [Last data sent: QUIT ] > mx01.earthlink.net: Timed out [Last data sent: QUIT ] > mx09.earthlink.net: Timed out [Last data sent: QUIT ] ></snip> > > Do any of you qmail folks know anything I might pass on to the kplug > list guru to help it cope with the earthlink situation better? Perhaps your problem is the location kernel-panic.org has chosen. The public email system is splitting in two, a spam tolerant side and a civilized side. Increasingly, email administrators are realizing that no legislature and no backbone carrier is going to help, and we have to simply stop accepting email from the spammy side. We firewall them, we blocklist them, we reject them by domain. We have little choice. According to DNS and tcptraceroute, kernel-panic.org is on an ISP called American Digital Network, adnc.com. Search groups.google.com for "adnc.com" and "spam" and see what you get. Limit your search to the last 18 months. Perhaps Earthlink has had enough of that abuse and firewalled adnc.com. Just a possibility. It's also possible Earthlink's servers are overloaded by all the Microsoft worms and they don't respond quickly enough to keep kernel-panic.org's Qmail engaged. Cameron |
|
|||
|
Cameron L. Spitzer wrote:
> Perhaps your problem is the location kernel-panic.org has > chosen. The public email system is splitting in two, > a spam tolerant side and a civilized side. > Increasingly, email administrators are realizing that no > legislature and no backbone carrier is going to help, > and we have to simply stop accepting email from the > spammy side. We firewall them, we blocklist them, > we reject them by domain. We have little choice. > > According to DNS and tcptraceroute, kernel-panic.org > is on an ISP called American Digital Network, adnc.com. > Search groups.google.com for "adnc.com" and "spam" > and see what you get. Limit your search to the last > 18 months. Perhaps Earthlink has had enough > of that abuse and firewalled adnc.com. Just a > possibility. It's also possible Earthlink's servers are > overloaded by all the Microsoft worms and they don't > respond quickly enough to keep kernel-panic.org's Qmail > engaged. Well, I don't know anything about qmail or mailing lists, but I know quite a lot about blocklists and how they work. If EL had the kplug's server's ip address on its known spam blocklist, it would be blocked, not sometimes delayed more or less and not some kind of CNAME problem. EL has several modes of blocking its spam, known spamsources versus suspect spam - which is neither known spamsource ip and not user whitelisted and which it chooses to use its style of challenge-response 'against'. This is not a ip address blocking problem. Whatever the condition or reputation of adnc might be, the mail from kplug comes from 206.251.247.139 rDNS sparkplug.kernel-panic.org which is not listed on any of the popular dnsbl/s accessed by the openrbl.org cumulative listings of 37 popular dnsbl/s, currently. What I'm learning over at EL lately is that qmail 'has to' do that CNAME lookup, which might not go well. http://www.es.qmail.org/documentacio...ail-FAQ-6.html <snip> 6.5 How do I deal with CNAME lookup failed temporarily? The log showed that a message was deferred for this reason. Why is qmail doing CNAME lookups, anyway? Answer: The SMTP standard does not permit aliased hostnames (see http://pobox.com/~djb/im/cname.html), so qmail has to do a CNAME lookup in DNS for every sender and recipient host. CNAME lookup failed temporarily means that the relevant DNS server is down. It will try again soon. </snip> The EL person seems to think that the qmail may be having trouble there and that what I posted about the EL mx/s timing out isn't where the error msg is coming from.- so he's blaming the situation on the configuration at kplug, that the DNS servers in /etc/resolve.conf aren't getting the CNAME. Of course, I can't figure out why that should be -- but I'm a little confused by that process described in the qmail docs above and also in the link above over at pobox where it talks more about cname. -- Mike Easter |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:51:53 GMT, Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid>
may have written: [snip] > Return-Path: <> > Received: (qmail 20956 invoked for bounce); 5 Nov 2003 09:36:09 -0000 > Date: 5 Nov 2003 09:36:09 -0000 > From: MAILER-DAEMON@sparkplug.kernel-panic.org > To: kplug-list-return-65662-@kernel-panic.org > Subject: failure notice > > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at sparkplug.kernel-panic.org. > I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following > addresses. > This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. > ><munged@earthlink.net>: > CNAME lookup failed temporarily. (#4.4.3) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long. ><snip> > > In addition, I did a little investigation of earthlink.net at dnsstuff: > > http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsre...=earthlink.net > ><snip> > INFO MX Record Your 11 MX records are: > > 5 mx10.earthlink.net. [TTL=1800] IP=207.217.120.241 [TTL=1800] > 5 mx1.earthlink.net. [TTL=1800] IP=207.217.125.16 [TTL=1800] > 5 mx3.earthlink.net. [TTL=1800] IP=207.217.125.18 [TTL=1800] > 5 mx4.earthlink.net. [TTL=1800] IP=207.217.125.19 [TTL=1800] > 5 mx5.earthlink.net. [TTL=1800] IP=207.217.125.20 [TTL=1800] > 5 mx6.earthlink.net. [TTL=1800] IP=207.217.125.21 [TTL=1800] > 5 mx7.earthlink.net. [TTL=1800] IP=207.217.125.22 [TTL=1800] > 5 mx01.earthlink.net. [TTL=1800] IP=207.217.120.29 [TTL=1800] > 5 mx07.earthlink.net. [TTL=1800] IP=207.217.120.132 [TTL=1800] > 5 mx08.earthlink.net. [TTL=1800] IP=207.217.120.201 [TTL=1800] > 5 mx09.earthlink.net. [TTL=1800] IP=207.217.120.216 [TTL=1800] In the Yet More Qmail Addons section of qmail.org: Christopher K. Davis has a patch to accept oversize DNS packets which works on both qmail's dns.c and tcpserver's dns.c. Or better yet, install djbdns, which is more secure than bind. http://www.ckdhr.com/ckd/qmail-103.patch qmail has trouble with DNS responses greater than 512 bytes. The patch above will fix the problem. Better yet, have them install djbdns as a local cache on the machine that runs their mail, and point resolv.conf to it. Cheers, -- Brian T Glenn delink.net Internet Services |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|