Tony wrote:
> Toby A Inkster wrote:
>> Jonathan Sachs wrote:
>>
>>> Speaking technically, it seems to me that PHP is likely to be a poor
>>> choice for large-scale services where hundreds or thousands of users
>>> will be hitting the web site at the same time.
>>
>> It seems to have worked well enough for Yahoo, Facebook and Wikipedia.
>>
>
> You know, I keep hearing that argument, but I've never seen any
> substantial evidence to back it up.

I just realized that my post could be read wrong - the argument that I
haven't seen substantial supporting evidence for is the argument that
PHP is not good for high-traffic sites.