Thread: Spam bounce
View Single Post

  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-09-2007
Martin Gregorie
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Spam bounce

Martin Treide-Heuser wrote:
> Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
>> That's a very bad idea for several reasons:

>
> In general, yes. But sometimes i got penetrant spam (100 and more) from one
> spammer. In theese cases i search for the spammer and/or the shop which
> profits from the spam and bombard it.
>

Searching for the beneficiary and/or the people that paid the spammer is
a good idea, but there we disagree. I'd report them to the relevant
authorities rather than bombarding them: the police should be interested
for a number of reasons ranging from inciting spam (and following the
cash trail to the spammers) to the likelihood of catching people selling
counterfeit goods.


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |
Reply With Quote