On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 05:38:34 -0700, MSW wrote:

> Michael Kerrisk <michael.kerrisk.at.gmx.net@nospam.com> wrote in message news:<es0bj05js3ts9gu89dttbones958sfbak2@4ax.com>. ..
>> On 31 Aug 2004 13:25:21 -0700, google@webstuf.net (MSW) wrote:
>>
>> >Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@iki.fi.NOSPAM.invalid> wrote in message news:<xmVYc.35$em1.14@read3.inet.fi>...
>> >> MSW wrote:
>> >> > I'm a member of a development team looking for someone with strong
>> >> > Linux sys admin and Sendmail skills. Ideally I'd like to find a
>> >> > hosting company or small ISP that may be interested in partnering on a
>> >> > project with very strong potential. An individual with the needed
>> >> > skills would also be welcome. I have a tech, sales, legal team in
>> >> > place but need linux talent. Is there anyone in this group who would
>> >> > be available for discussion or who could point me in the direction of
>> >> > a good place to find what I'm looking for?
>> >>
>> >> You'd better off if you could convince the Linux community
>> >> that you're not constructing a novel spam-spewer.
>> >>
>> >> Tauno Voipio
>> >> tauno voipio (at) iki fi
>> >
>> >actually just the opposite - we've constructed a novel spam *skewer*.
>> >We even have an attorney on board who is currently in the process of
>> >suing some well known, notorious spammers via can-spam as part of the
>> >project. We hope to get some notoriety for the project by putting a
>> >few spammers out of business and in jail. Is that convincing enough?
>> >:)
>>
>> And more convincing still if this post was not totally anonymous.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Michael
>
> Thanx for the advice but I've received plenty of responses from people
> who realize that you have to inquire to find the answers to concerns.
> It appears I've found the right guy for the opportunity but if need
> be, next time I'll include my resume, SSN, and a disclaimer, "brain
> dead pussies not wanted".

Wow, this guys sound like a real winner. Where do I sign up?

Fortunately (or perhaps sadly), the number of people who desire to
eradicate spam far outweighs the number of idiots who actually respond to
it. Therefore, its days are numbered.

- dan