Skylar Thompson <skylar@amayatra.os2.dhs.org> writes:

> On 09 Jul 2003 09:02:34 GMT, Casper H.S Dik <Casper.Dik@Sun.COM> wrote:
> > Skylar Thompson <skylar@amayatra.os2.dhs.org> writes:
> >
> >>I've had good experience with the ACLs in SGI's XFS filesystem. They are
> >>fully POSIX-compliant, and journaled too. Ext3 recently got ACL support as
> >>well, but I believe it's in the form of a kernel patch. XFS has had ACLs
> >>from the beginning, and they are likely to be safer for production
> >>use.
> >
> > There's no such thing as "fully POSIX-compliant ACLs".
>
> Yes there are. XFS supports the standards specified in POSIX 1003.1e.
>

Well, according to e.g. http://wt.xpilot.org/publications/po.../download.html

Important note: The standards IEEE 1003.1e and IEEE 1003.2c are both drafts
and withdrawn. This means, that both are neither finished nor worked on by
the IEEE any longer.


Bye, Dragan

--
Dragan Cvetkovic,

To be or not to be is true. G. Boole No it isn't. L. E. J. Brouwer