View Single Post

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-22-2004
prg
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: broadcast route suddenly missing


Craig Cameron wrote:
> For some reason my broadcast route has disapeared. When I try to

telnet to
> my RedHat 7.2 router, it takes about 20 seconds for the login prompt

to
> appear.
>
> The machine is routing, and DNS Caching perfectly.


Doubtful. If it's taking 20 seconds for a prompt where it used to
take, say 5, then I would immediately suspect DNS -- assuming of course
that you're telneting from another net. If you're on the same segment,
then ...

> The route that I'm missing is:
>
> 255.255.255.255 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 eth1


This is so obscure, it's useless. Missing from where? Route tables?
NIC? DHCP server? DNS?

> IFCONFIG shows that the UP BROADCAST is set. I have restarted and

rebooted,
> but no luck.


What's an UP BROADCAST? That means the net connection is UP, BROADCAST
is enabled.

Actually, ifconfig output -- all of it -- is what is needed here
together with route -n. If you want to obscure your IPs, use XXX.XXX
for the first two octets, eg. But _all_ of the netmask.

[pbrain]$ /sbin/ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:D0:04:06:AC
inet addr:XXX.XXX.201.57 Bcast:255.255.255.255
Mask:255.255.248.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:555440 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:174507 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
RX bytes:377182729 (359.7 Mb) TX bytes:13127921 (12.5 Mb)
(downloaded a dbms earlier)

[pbrain]$ /sbin/route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
XXX.XXX.200.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.248.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0
lo
0.0.0.0 XXX.XXX.200.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
eth0



> The only thing that I have changed in the past month, is the

forwarders in
> the DNS. I have disabled the NAMED daemon, then tried to telnet to

it, but
> the same results.


Could be you're forwarding DNS where you should not -- no way for me to
even guess without specific data/info/command output.

> I also noticed that both my NIC's were on IRQ 11. I changed it, so

they are
> now on different IRQ's, but no go.


Why on earth did you even try this and what did you expect to gain?
The hardware "stirs" IRQ requests and it's not unusual to see 5 or 6
items on IRQ 11.

> Any help is appreciated.
>


Since I don't know where you're telenting from or the layout of your
problem net or your IPs or what netmask you _should_ be using or
whether probnet is using static IPs or DHCP or what your default route
is/should be or -- well, you get the picture. Solving network problems
requires bright light, not midnight fog. Especially long distance.

Get back with the needed info and someone around here will likely get
you an answer.

prg
email above disabled

Reply With Quote