Re: Apache 2.x won't do virtual host like 1.x
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 13:02:49 -0700,
Jim Stanley <jhs-dash-angl-dash-music.at@at.earthlink-dot.net> posted:
> I'm having similar problems, and in looking through various setup docs
> on the net, it looks like Apache cannot do virtual hosts without a name
> server on that machine to specify the hosts. Is this correct? I tried
> to do much the same as Paul (creating different directories and server
> names in a virual hosts file) and have had similar override problems.
> The docs seem to point to the DNS thing, but I'm not sure.
I don't recall having any problems using my hosts file to test out virtual
hosts, though it could be down to the specific builds of Apache that we've
used. Is your system set up to use the hosts file *then* try a DNS server
to resolve names?
Of course, running your own DNS server helps with all sorts of
experimenting. I'd advocate doing so, if you can.
--
If you insist on e-mailing me, use the reply-to address (it's real but
temporary). But please reply to the group, like you're supposed to.
This message was sent without a virus, please delete some files yourself.
|