bob parker wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 04:03, zavaboy wrote:
>
>>*Sigh*, lets say I have:
>>
>>2.65
>>3.3
>>5.2670
>>12.030
>>
>>I would like it at least 2 decimal places.. So, 5.2670 would be 5.267 not
>>5.27:
>>
>
>
> 5.267 is 3 decimal places - count them
>

He said "at least 2 decimal places", not "exactally two decimal places".